45 years ago today

My girlfriend Paula Christison had been over, and we’d been studying, then watching something on the little black and white TV we had. My Carleton roommate, Lee G. Hill, was there too. Lee and I had been great friends in Calgary. In junior high, we’d started a couple fanzines with Beatles-centric themes. In our shared room on Second Russell, we had a couple John Lennon posters up amongst the punk rock stuff.

Paula left for her place downtown, so Lee and I were studying when the phone rang. It was Paula. “John Lennon’s been shot, babe,” she said. “It’s on the radio.”

His assassination, on December 8, 1980, was of course a terrible tragedy – and so, to me, was the fact that his last album (before the inevitable avalanche of ham-fisted compilations and retrospectives) was a piece of self-indulgent, saccharine shite like Double Fantasy.

Generally, he always needed Paul as an editor, and vice-versa. But his best album – and one of the best albums of all time, in my view – was Plastic Ono Band. It was like him: it was stark, and raw, and different, and deeply, deeply personal. Some say the LP was the product of his dalliance with primal scream therapy, or his response to the (necessary, and overdue) collapse of the Beatles. To me, it was instead an actual piece of art and great rock’n’roll, improbably found under the same piece of shrink wrap. Like listening to someone’s soul, without having received an invite to do so.  You should listen to it today.

The next morning, exams weren’t cancelled, though it felt to me like they should have been. When I walked into Carleton’s gym, there was a guy sitting there, already wearing a John Lennon T-shirt. I wanted to punch him. Instead, I just took my seat and wrote the stupid exam.

Forty five years. I can’t believe he’s been gone that long; I can’t believe I’m way older than he ever got a chance to be. It sucks.

Here’s my favourite picture of him, the one I used to use on posters I’d make up for Hot Nasties shows.  I liked it because he looked like a punk. That’s Stu in the background, I think.  Also long gone.

We miss you, John.  Hardly knew you.

Lennon_l


The British Trump

LONDON – Is this Nigel Farage’s “grab ’em by the pussy” moment?

For those who were asleep or in a coma in October 2016: one month before the U.S. presidential vote, the fabled Access Hollywood tape was published by the Washington Post.

On the tape, Donald Trump is heard saying, and we quote: “I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. … Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.”

The “they” was women. The “I” was Donald Trump.

It was awful, it was misogynistic, and – as things turned out – it was no impediment whatsoever to winning the presidency. The Access Hollywood tape notwithstanding, Trump narrowly won the 2016 race, which probably said more about Americans than it did about him. But I digress.

For days here in the United Kingdom, there has been a similar sort of controversy raging about a similar sort of politician – you know, the bigoted, bilious old man type of politician. Nigel Farage.

Farage – whose name does not rhyme with “garbage,” but possibly could – is the leader of Reform UK, which is essentially the British equivalent of MAGA Republicans. He has been credibly pegged as a possible future Prime Minister. Like Trump, Farage says lots of things that are outrageous. But this time, Farage may have been a bit too, too outrageous.

There is no incriminating tape in Farage’s case, but there are nearly 30 former schoolmates of Farage. All have stepped forward to assist the left-leaning tabloid, The Guardian, in its investigation into Farage’s conduct when he attended Dulwich college school in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

[To read more, subscribe here]


Fourteen reasons

Fourteen reasons why we need to stop violence against women.

• Geneviève Bergeron (born 1968), civil engineering student

• Hélène Colgan (born 1966), mechanical engineering student

• Nathalie Croteau (born 1966), mechanical engineering student

• Barbara Daigneault (born 1967), mechanical engineering student

• Anne-Marie Edward (born 1968), chemical engineering student

• Maud Haviernick (born 1960), materials engineering student

• Maryse Laganière (born 1964), budget clerk in the École Polytechnique’s finance department

• Maryse Leclair (born 1966), materials engineering student

• Anne-Marie Lemay (born 1967), mechanical engineering student

• Sonia Pelletier (born 1961), mechanical engineering student

• Michèle Richard (born 1968), materials engineering student

• Annie St-Arneault (born 1966), mechanical engineering student

• Annie Turcotte (born 1969), materials engineering student

• Barbara Klucznik-Widajewicz (born 1958), nursing student


Going underground

LONDON – This city’s subway system – the Underground or the Tube, they variously call it – is simply enormous. Millions of people use it every day.

In all, it is 250 miles in length – ten times the length of the City of Toronto, essentially, from East to West. It serves nearly 300 stations, across more than a dozen lines – while Toronto has four, connecting with just 75 or so stations.

London’s underground dwarfs Toronto’s subway system. Depending on how you measure it, it is 400 to 500 per cent bigger.

And in all of 2025, so far, for every million rides taken on London’s Underground? There were just 20.7 crimes committed. The majority of them are thefts and “anti-social behaviour.”

Toronto? Between 2016 and 2024, the number of crimes happening on Toronto’s transit system – serious crimes, like attempted murders and extreme violence and sexual assaults – surged by more than 160 per cent. In Toronto, a person is taken into custody under the Mental Health Act once every four times a TTC constable reports to work to patrol the subway, a July Toronto Sun analysis found.

As our Justin Holmes reported on 1,150 incidents in just a few months in 2020: “[The events in the TTC database include] petty crime and individual instances of aggravated assault, attempted murder, robbery.”

Added Holmes: “At St. George Station on Dec. 14, 2023, a person was said to have been apprehended three times under the Mental Health Act in a span of 24 hours, twice by TTC constables and once by Toronto cops. Meanwhile, on April 18 at Dundas Station, a person was seen smoking a cigarette in the tunnel. ‘Victim mentioned being suicidal and the hospital keeps releasing them,’ the entry says.”

In multiple cases, Holmes noted, there are repeated references to narcotics use – and several entries “contain the words ‘urine’ or ‘urinate,’” he wrote. The crimes happened at every single Toronto subway station. Since the pandemic, too, the crime numbers in Toronto have gotten dramatically worse.

Toronto councillor Brad Bradford – who, full disclosure, this writer will be supporting if he is on next year’s mayoral ballot – is one of the few municipal politicians addressing the issue. “Transit safety is a major issue in Toronto,” says Bradford. “Riders deserve real protection — and enforcement that will actually keep them safe.”

Toronto is not alone. Transit-related violent crime has exploded across Canada. Between 2015 and 2024, violent crime has nearly tripled in Winnipeg, and more than doubled in Edmonton, Montreal, Kitchener-Waterloo and Toronto.

So how does London do it? How can a system that dwarfs any transit system in Canada do so much better?

If one uses the Underground, as this writer has many times in the past few days, some of the reasons become evident. For starters, the London Underground has an extensive closed-circuit television system – there seems to be hardly an inch of public space that is not monitored.

In addition, Transport for London and the British Transport Police are seen virtually everywhere, as are regular transit staff – and commuter-assistance “help points,” some 500 of them, are found throughout the Underground. Travellers need only push a button to get connected instantly to a staff person or a central control room.

There are crowd-management people at busy times. There are anti-suicide measures in effect everywhere. And, throughout the day, commuters are urged to report any suspicious activity, ranging from petty crime to terrorism. “See it, say it, sort it,” announcers chime on public address systems, while providing a text number to do so.

And, across British capital’s system, that is what one sees, everywhere: people connected to the Internet on their devices. Some still are old-fashioned, and read books, but most are online – which likely serves to deter plenty of would-be criminals.

“The biggest crime here is phone thefts,” says one former Calgarian who has lived in London for years. “Mainly teenagers.”

Toronto and other cities have many of the anti-crime measures described above. So why does London do so much better, by virtually every measure?

Throughout London’s Underground, visitors are struck by how courteous and efficient the whole system seems to be: there’s tended plants at the Embankment at High Street Kensington Station, requests that travels “please” hold hand rails and stay to the right on escalators, announcers apologizing for the rain causing some surfaces to be slippery, and signage politely cautioning against staff abuse, sexual harassment and hate crimes – all “have consequences,” the signs note.

And the people using London’s Underground seem to be uniformly…decent. Few pan-handlers, for example, are to be seen – and, when they were present outside a Tube entrance, someone was talking to them to offer them something to eat or simply say “good luck.”

London’s transit system is better than our systems in Canada because everyone here has seemingly made a decision to treat everyone else with this:

Civility.


Those anti-Israel, pro-Palestine X accounts? They’re fake.

Elon Musk’s X has pulled back the curtain on thousands of accounts found on the micro-blogging platform. The results have been shocking, entertaining and – for anti-Israel and/or antisemitic propagandists – deeply embarrassing.

In recent days, X – formerly Twitter – quietly revealed a new feature that displayed previously-secret information about user accounts. The platform’s head of product, Nikita Bier, said the change was part of an effort to “secure the integrity” of X.

Alongside the date when a user joined X/Twitter is new information: descriptions about where the account is based, and where it was first connected to the social media platform. Also included is information about how many times the user has changed their name.

For many years, Twitter/X had permitted its users to hide behind fake identities. While that still is the case, the new feature is revealing startling details about how truthful those accounts really are.

In particular, the new location feature has left the variously anti-Israel, antisemitic, pro-Palestine, pro-Hamas fringe reeling. A sampling of the revelations:

  • “Motasem A Dalloul,” whose profile photo shows a bearded man in a flak jacket and helmet, is a self-described journalist professing to be reporting on atrocities committed by what he calls the “Israeli occupation.” He has nearly 200,000 followers, and his claims have often been republished by Western news agencies. X, however, says he joined Twitter via the Twitter store in the U.K. – and is based in Poland.
  • “Torah Judaism” is an anti-Zionist account with 12,000 followers, and regularly attacks supporters of Israel (including this writer, just last week). Torah Judaism claims to be based in New York – but is actually in the Philippines, says X.
  • “Times of Gaza” proclaims it offers the “latest news, updates and top stories from occupied Palestine,” and has nearly a million followers. It declares “Location: Palestine.” But its real location, according to the platform? East Asia – and it was first connected to Twitter/X via the “North Africa App Store.”
  • “Tiberius,” an anti-Israel account ostensibly maintained by a far-Left British journalist, is in Thailand, X says, and has had 24 username changes in the past seven years.
  • “Ameer from Gaza,” his profile complete with a tiny Palestinian flag, says he posts “from the heart of Gaza and the womb of suffering” and is part of “a family of five orphans who lost both of their parents.” Except the account is operating far from from Gaza, says X – in the United Kingdom.
  • “Mohammad Smiry,” professes to be “a Palestinian, born, raised and based in Gaza” and “tweets about my life under the occupation!” He has nearly a million followers, including many journalists in the West. His real location, according to X? Indonesia.

Other revelations shared by X follow the same disturbing trend. “North Gaza Survivors” is actually in Pakistan. “Rafah residents,” in Indonesia. Hamas’ Nukhba special forces unit wasn’t in the Gaza strip, says X – it was uploading content from Malaysia. “Mahmoud in Gaza,” an account with 21,000 followers? It’s in the Netherlands.

There are hundreds of accounts like these – people claiming to be Palestinian and based in the Gaza strip, but actually posting content far from the frontlines in the Middle East. Many of them successfully seek donations, as well. But, according to X at least, the anti-Israel users are based in Africa, Europe, Asia and – frequently – Canada.

After the location feature started to roll out, some “pro-Palestinian” users panicked. They changed their location or, in some cases, shut down their accounts entirely. Some claim to be using a VPN – a virtual private network – to create a secure and encrypted connection to the Internet, and insisted that X was wrong about its own data. X/Twitter has not commented on those claims. It simply says “country or region may not be accurate.”

The reality, as with most things on the Internet, isn’t easy to ascertain. The truth is elusive.

One truth is irrefutable, however, as I write in my forthcoming book, The Hidden Hand: a propaganda campaign has been built to attack Jews, the Jewish state and Western democracy.

And it is massive, global, and effective.